The court received the necessary answers by the beginning of the hearing. which took place last week. on April 16. Pavel Bagryantsev tried to use them to convince the court that Google LLC is not a party to the relationship with Radio 44 and. as a result.
Should not be a party to the lawsuit
(despite the! fact that the notice of deactivation of Russian AdSense accounts was signed by Google LLC). He referred to rcs data bank documents that state that the party to the relationship with Radio 44 is Google Ireland !Ltd. and that the funds were transferred based on the terms of AdSense.
“The plaintiff. in! compliance with Federal Law No. 173-FZ “On Currency Regulation and Currency Control”. provided the bank with documents showing who the parties to the transfer were and under what agreement the funds were received.
and the bank! conducted an audit and noted that the counterparty was Google Ireland based on the AdSense terms. Due to the actions of the plaintiff and the bank. it becomes obvious that the terms of Google and YouTube have nothing to do with the case. otherwise these terms would have been in the currency transaction. Therefore. the plaintiff did not provide these documents to the court and they were requested.
” said Pavel Bagryantsev.
In other words. according to Pavel Bagryantsev. . Tatyana Marshanova. has access to accounts on these services. At the same time. he did not provide any explanations about the business ties between Google LLC
Pavel Bagryantsev took the impact of visual content of trouble to explain to the court how exactly advertising is arranged in the AdSense service (to which. according to him. Google LLC has no relation).
Pavel Bagryantsev is of the opinion that the user agreements of Google.
YouTube and AdSense are of a framework nature. According to them. the American IT giant has “one solid right and no obligations” to the plaintiff. and if. in the opinion of Tatyana Marshanova. the dating data American service violated any of the AdSense clauses. then she needs to indicate which one.
Google Ireland Ltd. attorney Maxim Yuzhakov tried to help Google LLC escape from the proceedings. According to him. Google LLC ended up in the case “for the company”. and the plaintiff’s claims relate only to the AdSense service.